In a recent interview, Professor Angus Dalgleish, known for developing a mycobacterium vaccine (which boosts the immune system and helps prevent certain cancers), shared his views about COVID-19 vaccines and their potential long-term effects. The discussion raised serious concerns about certain vaccines and regulatory oversight during the pandemic.

Key Claims About Pandemic Origin and Vaccines

Professor Dalgleish maintains that SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a laboratory, pointing to what he describes as “six inserts” in the virus that he believes could not have arisen naturally. From early 2020, he claims to have identified potential issues with the vaccines, particularly regarding their biological similarity to human tissues.

According to the professor, the COVID-19 vaccines were “80% homologous to human tissues,” meaning the antibodies generated to attack the virus could potentially attack human tissues as well, making “side effects and autoimmunity inevitable.” He suggests this information was shared through the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance (comprising Canada, United States, UK, Australia, and New Zealand) but was ignored.

Manufacturing and Safety Concerns

One of the more troubling allegations made during his interview involves the manufacturing process of the vaccines. Professor Dalgleish claims there was a “bait and switch” where the vaccines used in clinical trials differed from those in the mass rollout. Specifically, he alleges the production method changed to using E. coli bacteria, potentially introducing DNA contamination.

The professor expressed concern that these contaminants could integrate into the human genome and remain there for life, possibly affecting future generations if they enter germ cells. He links this to what he calls “turbo cancers” – an emerging term describing aggressive, fast-moving cancers that present at advanced stages and rapidly metastasize.

Questioning COVID-19 Policies

Professor Dalgleish strongly criticizes the decision to vaccinate children, referencing UK Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty’s statement that children should be vaccinated to protect grandparents. He argues this logic was flawed since, if the vaccines worked, the grandparents should have already been protected by their own vaccinations.

The interview takes a strong stance against global regulatory bodies, including the FDA, MHRA (UK), and TGA (Australia), accusing them of “incompetence” and “negligence” in approving vaccines that Professor GLE believes showed concerning safety signals from the beginning.

Calls for Accountability

Throughout his interview, there are repeated calls for accountability from health officials and regulatory bodies who approved the certain vaccines. Professor Dalgleish suggests that individuals responsible should face legal consequences for what he characterizes as “criminal negligence.”

Embracing Natural Wellness

Many health advocates, myself included, suggest that staying deeply connected to nature’s bounty—whole foods, natural medicines, and traditional remedies that have sustained humanity for millennia—may help prevent issues potentially arising from insufficiently tested modern interventions. This philosophy embraces the idea that our bodies were designed with remarkable self-healing capabilities that function optimally when supported by natural substances and practices aligned with our biological makeup. By honouring these natural systems and the wisdom embedded in traditional approaches to wellness, individuals may strengthen their resilience while remaining in harmony with what many believe our creator intended for human health and wellbeing.