Recent discussions have reignited controversy over COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreements between Pfizer and various countries, highlighting how crucial information was overlooked by mainstream media during the initial vaccine rollout.
Key Points from Leaked Contracts
- Purchasers acknowledge that long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are unknown
- Potential for unknown adverse effects, including death
- Pfizer appears to be absolved of liability for side effects
- Governments agree to cover damages from potential side effects
- Contracts cannot be canceled even if cheaper or more effective alternatives become available
These revelations come from leaked contracts with Brazil, Albania, South Africa and other countries. A similar clause was found in Canada’s contract through an Access to Information request.
Early Warnings Ignored
Remarkably, these contract details were uncovered and shared on social media platforms as early as 2021. However, mainstream media outlets largely ignored these revelations, focusing instead on promoting vaccine uptake and echoing assurances from health authorities and pharmaceutical companies that the vaccines were “safe and effective”.
This discrepancy between the contractual language and public messaging raises questions about transparency and informed consent during the global vaccination campaign.
Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations
The principles of informed consent in medicine are fundamental to ethical medical practice and research. These principles, codified in various medical ethics guidelines, including the Nuremberg Code, emphasize the necessity of voluntary consent based on full disclosure of risks and benefits.
Key elements of informed consent include:
- Disclosure of the nature and purpose of the treatment or experiment
- Explanation of risks and potential side effects
- Discussion of benefits and alternative options
- Voluntary participation without coercion
- The right to refuse or withdraw consent
The Nuremberg Code, established in 1947 in response to Nazi medical experiments, explicitly states that “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” and that the subject should have “sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
In the context of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, it’s clear that these principles were compromised. The contractual acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects and potential adverse reactions, coupled with public messaging that often omitted these uncertainties, raises serious concerns because recipients weren’t truly given the opportunity for informed consent.
Furthermore, policies that restricted access to public spaces, employment, or education based on vaccination status have been criticized as forms of coercion, potentially violating the voluntary nature of informed consent.
The tension between the leaked contracts and established medical ethics principles highlights the ethical lapses during the pandemic response. It also underscores the importance of maintaining ethical standards even in crisis situations.
Israel’s Unique Agreement
Israel’s “Real World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement” with Pfizer stood out for its explicit framing of the country’s population as test subjects. This arrangement, while publicly available, received little scrutiny in international press.
Public Perception vs. Contractual Reality
While the public was repeatedly assured of vaccine safety and efficacy, the language in these contracts tells a different story. Phrases like “long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known” and acknowledgment of potentially unknown adverse effects stand in stark contrast to the confident public health messaging.
Media’s Role and Responsibility
The lack of mainstream media coverage on these contract details raises questions about the thoroughness of pandemic reporting. Critics argue that a more balanced approach, including discussion of these contracts, could have fostered a more informed public debate about vaccine policies.
Implications and Ongoing Concerns
As more people become aware of these previously overlooked contract details, there are growing calls for:
- Greater transparency in pharmaceutical agreements
- More rigorous and independent media investigation of public health initiatives
- Reassessment of informed consent protocols in mass vaccination programs
- Broader public discussion about balancing emergency response with long-term safety considerations
Looking Forward
These revelations prompt a reevaluation of how public health information is communicated and scrutinized, especially during global crises. They underscore the importance of maintaining a critical and transparent approach to both scientific developments and policy decisions, and the need for serious review of informed consent principles in medicine as they apply to vaccination.
Purely Rooted. 
Leave a comment